<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>The Washington Independent - U.S. news and politics - washingtonindependent.com: Comments by Charles R. Morris</title>
    <link>http://washingtonindependent.mypublicsquare.com/person/13391</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Charles R. Morris</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Writedowns  &amp;#8220;And what caused the assumption the bond is risky in the first place&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Many bonds were sold backed by, eg, risky home mortgages, but with credit ratings that suggested that default rates would be near-zero.  They paid interest only slightly higher than a risk-free Treasury bond.  Now that we know that actual default rates are much higher, traders require much higher yields (= lower prices) to purchase those bonds.  The lower price incorporates the information that the $50 payment is very much in doubt, even tho it&amp;#8217;s still being paid.  Almost all the writedowns are based on some sort of a market test.  There is a fair amount of evidence that banks haven&amp;#8217;t been writing down enough, altho that may now be changing because of criticisms from accounting standards bodies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://washingtonindependent.mypublicsquare.com/view/part-one-facing-the#content_15940</link>
      <guid>http://washingtonindependent.mypublicsquare.com/view/part-one-facing-the#content_15940</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Charles R. Morris</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
