Regarding yesterday's passage of the Democrats' Medicare bill: If there was ever question about what force of nature compelled nine Republicans to switch their "no" votes of last month to "yes" votes yesterday, they've been put to rest. Here's a hint: It wasn't because they like the legislation.
The new rule, sponsored by scandal-scarred Sen. David Vitter, adds a race-specific layer to a federal law that prohibits abortion coverage under federal health programs.
Senate Republicans are under intense pressure from physicians groups to stave off Medicare pay cuts, as 129 of their House counterparts did last month.
A controversial federal law designed to keep illegal immigrants out of Medicaid is still ensnaring U.S. citizens 18 months later.
Former Health and Human Services secretary Tommy Thompson urged action this week, saying 2009 brings a perfect storm to sweep through change.
At a news conference in Atlanta on Thursday (which I haven't seen, but read accounts of), the Atlanta parents of 9-year-old Hannah Poling revealed that in November, the vaccine court conceded their claim that vaccines caused her autism-like symptoms. At first glance, this case seems to contradict the scientific consensus that vaccines don't cause autism. Anti-vaccine groups are howling with glee about it. The decision requires some explanation, and it will take a bit of space.
House lawmakers pushing for broad patient benefits have been met with resistance by senators of both parties, the White House, business groups and the insurance industry.
It's unlikely that the White House will scrap the rules voluntarily, but states might take officials to court over the new legal opinion.
After Hurricane Katrina, FEMA pushed thousands into toxic trailers. Now the agency is turning to bad solutions -- for its bad solution.
States hoping to install broad SCHIP expansion plans face nearly impossible White House hurdles.
House Oversight Committee called the hearing to probe whether baseball star Roger Clemens used Human Growth Hormone, in the process Clemens may have perjured himself.
The back and forth between lawmakers and experts has become a repetitive exercise.
Uninsured women are three times more likely than the well-insured to have their breast cancers diagnosed when it may be too late to cure them, according to a major study published this week by the American Cancer Society. Uninsured patients with colon cancer are twice as likely to be diagnosed in the late stages, it found. Previous, smaller studies have shown similar results, but this piece of research included 3.7 million patients -- about 75 percent of all U.S. cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2004.
Today the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform investigated the 6th leading cause of death in the U.S.: infections from hospital errors. Last year alone, a startling 100,000 people died from hospital-associated infections and almost 2 million suffered non-fatal health problems.
Democratic and Republican Committee members and witnesses shared their astonishment at the volume of deaths. Henry A. Waxman, (D-Calif.), committee chairman, noted that thousands of deaths can be prevented by elementary procedures like hospital personnel washing their hands and using clippers instead of a razor to remove hair before surgery. "You seem to be of one mind," Waxman said to the witnesses representing government and the medical profession. "Unlike other causes of death, this is one we know how to reduce."
Less clear is how much government can do to reduce them. Cynthia Bascatta, Director of Health Care Issues at the Government Accountability Office, said one way to alleviate the problem is to improve information-sharing between the Centers for Disease Control and other agencies under the Department of Health and Human Services. In fact, four different agencies are compiling their own data on hospital associated infections. As Arthur Allen reported for The Independent, former CDC scientists believe the agency's hospital infection program is increasingly dysfunctional.
Since 2003, addicts in Vancouver, British Columbia have been able to shoot up with free heroin at a supervised “safer injection facility,” the first of its kind in North America. It has been a success, in the view of the 500 people who use it daily, their downtown east side neighbors (who report less crime), the city government (which sees it as part of its pre-2010 Winter Olympics beautification campaign) and even the cops. Research published in the British Medical Journal, the Lancet and elsewhere shows the facility has helped slow the spread of HIV and cut crime. Counselors available at the site have helped get many addicts off drugs. The same approach has been used for decades in Western Europe.
In a stunning move this summer, enough Republicans in Congress sided with Democrats to scale back funding for private plans under the federal health care system.
The New York Times' Robert Pear has been covering health care policy for years, and today he's got a nice succinct piece about the trouble facing Medicare and Medicaid. It's not a pretty picture. As Pear points out, the cost of the two programs last year was $627 billion, constituting 23 percent of all federal spending. In a decade that dollar figure will double, representing 30 percent of the budget.
To the surprise of no one, the House failed today to override Bush’s veto of SCHIP, the popular children’s health care program. Foreseeing this inevitability, last month Congress extended current levels of funding until after November’s elections (with a little extra to prevent states from running dry). But anyone who believes the issue won’t resurface in the campaign season didn’t follow last year’s debate very closely.
Indeed, the issue exposes the very heart of the (mostly) partisan ideological controversy over the role of government in providing health coverage.
A piece we ran this morning examines the current crisis in health care and the political barriers to fixing it. As the story points out, the U.S. spent about 16 percent of its gross domestic product -- or $2.1 trillion -- on health care in 2006. That raises the question: What do comparable countries spend on the same thing?
The quick answer: Not nearly as much. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which represents 30 developed-world democracies, Switzerland is second behind the U.S., spending 11.5 percent of its GDP on health care in 2004, the last year when comprehensive data are available. (By comparison, the U.S. spent 15.2 percent of GDP in the same year). Japan and the United Kingdom spent about half of what we did in 2004: 8.0 and 8.1 percent of GDP, respectively.
Five years ago, an epidemic caused by a previously unknown coronavirus, known as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), swept through China and then the world, killing 900 people and setting off a panic with billions in economic damage. Then, almost as suddenly as it sprang upon the unsuspecting world, SARS disappeared.
A few years later, I wrote in Slate that the virus would probably never return. Scientists had discovered that its main wild reservoir was a species of bats, I wrote. But the bat variety of SARS didn't effectively grow in people--it seemed to have mutated after infecting civet cats, a delicacy sold at many Chinese markets.After the epidemic, the Chinese slaughtered the civet cats and said they were closing the so-called "wet markets" at which wild game was sold live. It appeared the virus would