Anthrax Vaccine Loses to Lobbying

Politically Connected Firm Knocked Out Bay Area Start Up for Choice Contracts

By Arthur Allen 05/19/2008 | 3 Comments

Update: The Department of Health and Human Services sent a response after this story was originally posted. The department's comment has been inserted.

 

Six-and-a-half years after someone mailed finely milled anthrax spores to the U.S. Capitol, the industry created to respond to that attack has received billions in cash but produced little protection. A little-noticed news item last week reveals the most dramatic failure of the $5.6 billion Bioshield program, which was supposed to provide drugs and vaccines against terror agents--its cornerstone being the creation of a safe, effective vaccine against anthrax.

As demonstrated by the anthrax mailings—a case the FBI has yet to crack—deadly anthrax bacteria are a real potential threat. The most likely assailant in the October 2001 attack was an American scientist, perhaps someone who wanted not to kill, but to focus Congress' attention on the bioterror threat.

(Matt Mahurin) If that's the case, the attack was extremely successful. But in the so-far fruitless effort to get a better vaccine, the government has ruined one company that was developing an inventive solution while it has allowed another, politically well-connected firm to reap the benefits.

Last week, Emergent Biosolutions, which has been making a crude anthrax vaccine since the 1960s, under various names, quietly purchased recombinant anthrax vaccine technology for the bargain-basement price of $2 million. It bought the vaccine from Vaxgen, a sophisticated, San Francisco-area company that the government drove out of business through its bungled management of the Bioshield program. Vaxgen, which once had more than 300 employees, now has six, and is basically in the process of selling off its assets.

Emergent, which is based in Rockville, Md., but makes the old vaccine at a plant in Lansing, Mich., used an army of lobbyists to undercut Vaxgen’s relationship with the Dept. of Health and Human Services. In late 2006, HHS canceled a $878 million contract with Vaxgen, leaving the company holding the bag for more than $150 million it had spent to develop the vaccine. HHS said Vaxgen had failed to meet production deadlines; Vaxgen executives said they were delayed by minor technical problems that have since been clarified.

Vaxgen continued to improve its recombinant anthrax vaccine after HHS cut it loose, but it was unable to find a major drug company to buy it. After witnessing what HHS had done to Vaxgen, former company officials say, none of the major vaccine makers wanted to enter a contract with the government.

Emergent, on the other hand, was nothing if not politically connected. Its chief executive and his wife, for example, alone donated more than $220,000 to lobbying and political campaigns. Emergent had lobbied for years to paint Vaxgen as unreliable, and it ended up buying its vaccine for a song.

The story of the recombinant anthrax vaccine stands as the most poignant fiasco of the Bioshield program. President George W. Bush announced the program in 2003, during a visit to the National Institutes of Health. Bush said the program would “put NIH squarely in the midst of our war to defend America and to defeat international terrorism.”

The idea was to provide government stimulus to get drug companies to make products that had no market other than the government. Many scientists and public health officials believed it could have the secondary benefit of stimulating the development and manufacturing of much-needed civilian vaccines, at a time when the nation’s vaccine industry had been reduced, effectively, to five companies.

But five years later, companies that signed deals with HHS to produce anthrax vaccines, as well as drugs to fight radiation sickness, have dropped out of the program after acrimonious disagreements. One company, Acambis, has delivered a successful new vaccine against smallpox--a disease that was eradicated in 1980 and is believed to exist only in two secure laboratories. Except for a related effort to make pandemic flu vaccines, none of the big vaccine manufacturers have bought into the biodefense program.

Perhaps the most egregious fallout from Bioshield, however, was the destruction of Vaxgen, a company that included some of the country's most talented and experienced vaccine manufacturers. It was led by Lance Gordon, a scientist who helped create more than a dozen vaccines -- including a groundbreaking meningitis shot now given to all children in the United States, Europe and Latin America.

“It’s a horrible story,” said Donald Francis, the former president of Vaxgen. “We spent $150 million of our own money and $100 money in NIH to develop a vaccine. We miss a deadline and they jerk the contract and destroy the company. And there aren’t many vaccine companies. They took a high-tech company capable of making vaccines and killed it!

“This is a symptom of a government that doesn’t know what it’s doing when it comes to interacting with the private sector,” said Francis, who now leads a non-government organization that promotes vaccination in poor countries. “The Pentagon knows how to do things like this. Health and Human Services had never contracted out anything this big, and they didn’t know what they were doing.”

Under the terms of its contract with HHS, Vaxgen was obligated to use an aluminum-based adjuvant, or immune-stimulator, in the vaccine. But the adjuvant and the anthrax protein interacted in a way that caused the vaccine to lose potency. As a result, the company wasn’t able to meet its deadline for delivering the vaccine. “With trial and error we could have fixed the problem,” another former Vaxgen executive said. “It wasn’t a fundamental safety or efficacy problem.”

But Emergent, which was already producing an outdated anthrax vaccine, spent large sums of money on a lobbying campaign against Vaxgen, including hiring two former aides to Vice President Dick Cheney. Congressmen like Michael McCaul (R-Texas) and Mike Rodgers (R-Mich.), both recipients of Emergent executives’ campaign donations, attacked the Vaxgen contract in committee hearings, while Emergent’s lawyers wrote newspaper op-eds attacking the company.

What’s more, HHS frequently changed officials in charge of overseeing the contract, and none seemed to understand the complexities of making vaccines, the Vaxgen officials said. This impression was echoed by two other officials -- one at another company, the other at the Centers for Disease Control -- who asked not to be named.

While HHS has said it followed the letter of the law in canceling the contract, Vaxgen officials say it caved to political pressure. “We were under the illusion that if we did good science, we’d win out,” the official said. “That’s not how this works. Politics played a more important role than science." A government scientist familiar with the deal said that while Vaxgen was not blameless, its problems were typical of the trial-and-error nature of the vaccine-making process.

HHS spokesman Bill Hall denied that the agency had erred in withdrawing the Vaxgen contract. Vaxgen missed its deadlines and failed to fix its problems, he said, and HHS was still pursuing a recombinant anthrax vaccine.


The Vaxgen vaccine uses a refined anthrax protein and is designed to require three doses for long-term immunity. HHS signed the deal with Vaxgen to place the 1950s-vintage vaccine produced by Emergent, formerly called Bioport. The older vaccine, made from material extracted from living bacteria, requires six doses -- and yearly boosters.

In 1998, Bioport took over the Michigan state biologics laboratory, the nation’s sole manufacturer of anthrax vaccine. Starting with the Gulf War, all U.S. service members have received the vaccine. Many have blamed it for a variety of health problems, including autoimmune disorders. While expert panels have refuted claims that the vaccine causes seriously problems except in rare cases, resistance to the vaccine created a morale problem on some military bases. In 1998, for example, pilots at Dover Air Base in Delaware refused the vaccine, forcing their commander to suspend vaccination against anthrax.

After signing the 2004 contract with HHS, Vaxgen had two years to come up with 25 million doses of vaccine. In November 2006, the vaccine was not ready, and the contract was canceled.

But since the Vaxgen fiasco, the government has relaxed the rules, so that Emergent -- which, according to its Website, expects to seek an HHS contract for the vaccine soon -- will have several years to deliver it. The government will also provide milestone payments and cover development costs -- something it didn't do for Vaxgen.

“If we had had that system two years ago," said Gordon, "Vaxgen would probably already have provided millions of doses of a vaccine already to the national stockpile.”

But the Emergent company spokeswoman, Tracey Schmitt, said, "We believe that Emergent has both the experience and expertise to pursue development of this important medical countermeasure to meet the United States government's stated need." She declined to comment on the rest of this article.

Perhaps the worst fallout of the affair is the loss of Vaxgen. Over the past 30 years, most vaccine manufacturers have gradually gotten out of the business. The United States has to import all of its whooping cough vaccine, as well as more than half the 110 million doses of flu vaccine it uses every year. “If there were a bad flu year—not to speak of a pandemic—we would need hundreds of millions of doses,” says Gordon. “And during bad flu years, most countries prohibit export of their flu vaccine.”

Vaxgen had built a factory in South Korea, originally to make an HIV vaccine (which failed), and has another state-of-the-art factory in South San Francisco sitting idle. “We were becoming a company that could develop and manufacture a number of vaccines,” says Gordon, who recently started a new biotech company. “As a result of the cancellation of contract, that was thrown away.’’

Gordon tries to view the latest twist in a positive light. “I’m glad that someone picked up our recombinant vaccine,” he said. “From my perspective, it’s a good product. I’m hopeful that the huge investment and time and effort that went into it won’t go to waste.”


For $2 million, Emergent bought enough vaccine antigen to make millions of doses, along with the recipes it needs to make the vaccine. Including NIH and other funds, more than $250 million was spent to develop it.


“I hope we never find out whether it’s really effective in humans,” added Gordon. “God willing, another major anthrax attack will never happen.”

print print Share share

Comments:

nellevad
Posted 05/20/2008 01:04am with

As one who was far too heavily invested in VaxGen from the AIDS vaccine days is is sadily ironic to me to see that the light of day is finally being shed on this fiascio. Now what remains is to tell the rest of the story. While BioPort (later Emergent) was destroying VaxGen’s reputation they continued to reap the benefits by selling their hightly questionable vacine to the military and lobbying to force all military personell to take a six dose treatment. The Government new the vaccine needed replacing, hence the VaxGen contracts. BioPort has, as major investors, the Carlyle Group, made up of familiar faces in the Bush administration and also his own family. The Anthrax letters were sent to people in the media and to legislators highly critical of project Bioshield. The FBI has ceased working on the case (if they ever did) long ago. I continued to hold VaxGen until the end, refusing to believe a company working hard on an important government project would be tossed aside while an inferior product continued to be hoisted on our military personell for purely political and selfish financial interests. There are real crimes here, that will go unpunished, and now it appears that the company behind it has reaped all the benefits, letting VaxGen develope a better vaccine and then stealing it. There’s the real story. I only hope someone writes a book some day that exposes the full scope of this crime.

peacemakesplenty
Posted 05/22/2008 11:52am with

This story is interesting, but ignores the central fact that the primary subcontractor for both Vaxgen and Emergent Biosolutions (formerly Bioport, but still owned by the same people) was Battelle Memorial Institute. Here is the relevant quote from Vaxgen’s SEC filing, Oct 2002:

BEGIN:
October 3, 2002 – Brisbane, Calif. -VaxGen Inc. (Nasdaq: VXGN), the
current leader in AIDS vaccine development, has been awarded a contract from the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the U.S.
National Institutes of Health (NIH), to develop a new anthrax vaccine and to
create a feasibility plan to manufacture an emergency stockpile of 25 million
doses. NIAID is expected to award a separate contract in 2003 to manufacture the
stockpile.
injections over 18 months. The goal of the new government contract is to develop
a vaccine that proves to be safe in humans, efficacious in animal challenge
studies and requires no more than three injections.
$13.6 million to advance the development of a vaccine candidate initially
developed by the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
(USAMRIID). If results from the first phase are positive, VaxGen will be
eligible for an additional $13.6 million in 2003 as a continuation of the
current contract to support a Phase II clinical trial. A second, much larger
contract to manufacture the 25-million dose stockpile will be awarded by NIAID
through a competitive bid process next year.
manufacturing of vaccines, and reflects our commitment to develop a broad array
of biopharmaceutical products for the prevention and treatment of human
infectious diseases,” said VaxGen Chief Executive Officer Lance K. Gordon, Ph.D.
“Our objective is to meet or exceed the government’s requirements and be
selected to supply vaccine for the stockpile. If successful we would also plan
to sell the vaccine to other approved governments and private customers.”
primary responsibility for initial manufacturing of the vaccine candidate as
well as for conducting pre-clinical safety and efficacy studies in accordance
with FDA guidelines. VaxGen has budgeted approximately $4.5 million for
Battelle’s contributions to this urgent initiative. Battelle has substantial
experience in biologics research and development, specifically including anthrax
vaccines.”
END

As a major sub-contractor to VaxGen, Battelle of Columbus, Ohio, will have


A few technical notes: the Bioport/Emergent vaccine is the one that was injected into hundreds of thousands of soldiers in the most egregious human guinea pig experiment of this generation. Numerous sensitive individuals had severe, even life-terminating responses – this is your “Gulf War Syndrome”, as Gary Matsumoto reported in his fairly good book on the topic.

However, claims that Vaxgen had a superior product were not true – their product was apparently just as lethal and never made it into human trials. It was a recombinant product as well, and let’s explain what this means:

Battelle was screwing around with genetically engineering anthrax bacteria. This private non-profit corporation deserves a large amount of immediate scrutiny – they’ve already been caught in violation of U.S. biological warfare treaties several times. For more details, please read http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004_10/Tucker.asp

“On September 4, 2001, exactly one week before the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, a front-page story in The New York Times revealed the existence of three secret threat-assessment projects being conducted by the U.S. intelligence community and the Department of Defense:

• Project Jefferson, a plan by the Defense Intelligence Agency to reproduce a genetically modified strain of the anthrax bacterium developed by Russian scientists in the early 1990s, in order to determine whether or not the agent was resistant to the licensed U.S. anthrax vaccine.
• Project Clear Vision, a project by Battelle Memorial Institute, under contract to the CIA, to reconstruct and test a Soviet-designed biological bomblet so as to assess its dissemination
characteristics.
• Project Bacchus, an effort by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, a unit of the Defense Department, to construct a mock biowarfare production facility to assess the feasibility of mass-producing anthrax bacterial stimulant with off-the-shelf equipment.[4]

The Bush administration claimed that all three studies were consistent with the BWC because the underlying intent was defensive, but a number of international legal scholars disagreed.”

jasonsigger
Posted 05/22/2008 02:02pm with

“Last week, Emergent Biosolutions, which has been making a crude anthrax vaccine since the 1960s, under various names, quietly purchased recombinant anthrax vaccine technology for the bargain-basement price of $2 million.”

“But Emergent, which was already producing an outdated anthrax vaccine, spent large sums of money on a lobbying campaign against Vaxgen, including hiring two former aides to Vice President Dick Cheney.”

It may surprise you that the currently used anthrax vaccine is neither crude nor outdated. It was approved by the FDA as being safe and efficacious in the 1970s, and used by thousands of government civilians and hundreds of thousands of military personnel since then. Merely because the vaccine was formulated more than three decades ago doesn’t mean it is outdated – the basic threat of anthrax organisms has not changed since then, the equipment and processes for developing the vaccine has been constantly updated, and the overall percentage of bad reactions to the vaccine has been much, much lower than any other vaccine currently used.

I know it may be nice to cast BioPort/Emergent BioSolutions as the bad guy here, and yes, they played politics (as does every defense firm), but as long as HHS followed the rules, it ought to be hard to define a “bad guy” here. The military (as well as HHS) does want a vaccine that can be administered in less than six shots and that has fewer side effects, but that doesn’t mean that the current anthrax vaccine has anything wrong with its formulation or use. If you want a villain, blame the constantly changing BioShield program and the overly ambitious goals that the Bush administration laid out in 2004.

CATEGORIES IN THIS STORY:

Recent Articles by Arthur Allen

Most Popular