McCain's Path: A Tale of the West

The GOP Presidential Hopeful Is Not Only an Eastern Establishment Candidate

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) (AP Photo)
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) (AP Photo)
By Sridhar Pappu 06/25/2008 | 3 Comments

ONTARIO, Calif. --- On Monday, when Sen. John McCain stepped onto a steamy tarmac in Fresno, Calif., he did so as a man who had come from somewhere else, as generations of people before him, who had placed his future in the faith of the West.

Thirty-five years had passed since McCain had returned home from Vietnam, and it had been 25 years since he first ran as a congressman in one of the most Western of all Western states -- Arizona. Now he was the man who, perhaps without knowing it, wrapped himself in the mythology of the American West that, in truth, is the story, movement, of America itself.

It is hard, for many, to think of McCain as a man of the West. He was, and is, the product of the Eastern establishment, son and grandson of admirals, a graduate of Annapolis. Among those of us who call the nation's capital home, he seems inseparable from the corridors of the Senate, of press conferences announcing the culmination of some bipartisan deal.

(Matt Mahurin) But to see McCain solely as a man of Washington is to miss the point. We like to think of those west of the Mississippi as descendants of ranchers, of men like John Wayne's troubled-and-torn hero in John Ford's black-and-white epic "The Man who Shot Liberty Valance." But it is also the story of Wayne's counterpart in the film, the idealistic lawyer played by Jimmy Stewart, who comes from his safe Eastern trappings to make something of himself, to re-imagine himself, and who would, in short order, represent the needs of his adopted home in Washington.

"My first thought is his story doesn't look like part of the American West," said Patty Limerick, faculty director and chairwoman of the Board of the Center of the American West at the University of Colorado, where she's also a professor of history. "But his story is very much like the Western story of the 19th century -- of having been born somewhere else. Our stereotype of Westerners is so narrow now, that if you aren't descended from a miner, or rancher, you're not really from here. But [McCain's] story is the Western story."

Indeed, even his maverick title is something that is born of America's first massive Western migration, following the Civil War in the 1860s and 70s. Mavericks were the untended cattle, left unbranded, who were rounded up by those who came as part of the great cattle boom that followed the most awful period in this nation's history. At one moment they were not officially claimed, and at the next they were. It was part of creating a new way of life on one's own -- bordering, just bordering, on theft. That's part of the Western story as well.

Now McCain was in California--the physical birthplace of Richard M. Nixon and spiritual birthplace of Ronald Reagan, the place where Joan Didion once beautifully described as a "place in which a boom mentality and a sense of Chekovian loss meet in an uneasy suspension; in which the mind is troubled by some buried but ineradicable suspension that things had better work here, because beneath that immense bleached sky, is where we run out of continent."

And yet things have stopped working in California. This is no longer a place we can go to escape problems. Instead, its problems--energy, pollution, immigration, home foreclosures, unbounded gasoline prices-- serve as the template of domestic concerns that loom over this country in this dark and troubled time. Here, at the edge of the continental boundaries, is where the ideals of unbridled individualism--perhaps best personified by the freeways and exurbs of Los Angeles -- have been tempered by the needs of a struggling collective.

Following a speech at Fresno State on Monday -- where the school's president was absent due to his team's participation in the NCAA College World Series in Omaha, Neb. -- McCain stood in front of two space-aged electric cars, which he promised would someday be affordable to everyone, mirroring the same downward spiral of costs we saw with cellphones. Standing there in the blistering heat, surrounded by khaki-colored buildings with red Spanish-style roofs, McCain, who can seem out of place at certain venues, seemed very much at home.

"I’m a Western senator," said McCain, his head sporting a bandage on a wound he received getting out of a car during a recent trip to Canada. "I understand the issues ranging from Native Americans to water to public lands -- all of these issues I’ve had a vast experience and background in dealing with. I’m confident that I can compete and win here." One recent poll had McCain trailing Obama in the state by 12 percentage points.

And yet one couldn't help feeling the weight McCain was working under, beneath the legacy of Reagan. Reagan, was the Californian who formed the nation' modern vision of the Western politician -- the man who mythologically rode his horse from California, donned a suit, ended the Cold War in the way he deemed best and, in the process, suffused the country with his own brand of Western spirit. But Reagan was actually a stranger to the West, who came here to take care of Bonzo, marry and divorce Jane Wyman and reinvent the Republican Party -- and the nation -- for good and forever.

And while everyone, and we mean everyone, in the Republican primaries tried to liken themselves to "The Great Communicator," perhaps it's McCain that is best suited to lay claim to at least a sliver of the Gipper's legacy. While many of the Republican "base" might bristle at such a comparison, the fact is that Reagan was, at his core, a practical man, willing compromise on issues like immigration.

"I don't think McCain is a reincarnation of Reagan," said Lou Cannon, who covered Reagan for The Washington Post and wrote a a plethora of Regan biographies. "Everyone's looking for the next Michael Jordan and there's only one Michael Jordan. Reagan comes out of an era where the Western Republicans were essentially libertarians. And I think McCain's soul hearkens back to that era of conservatism. McCain as Reagan doesn't work. McCain as a representative of the Reagan era, of being a practical, libertarian conservative, does work."

But what McCain also shares with Reagan is an understanding of the duality of the West. Here is a place that prided itself on the rancher, the lone man on the trail, on wanting to be left alone to one's own business. But it's a place whose very existence as a living, thriving entity could not have come about without the hand of big government. During the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, working off the economic ideals of John Maynard Keynes, commissioned untold work projects and development under the auspices of the New Deal. It was the federal government that provided the dams and roads, the infrastructure that allowed the 20th century building of the West as not only a viable place to live, but the place to live, the golden land.

"The fact is the West is becoming a very urban place," said Bill Fulton, a senior scholar at the USC School of Policy and author of "The Reluctant Metropolis:The Politics of Urban Growth in Los Angeles" who is also deputy mayor of Ventura, Calif. "I have a friend who calls it small lots and lots of big sky. People here are at once very office-bound but very open-space-oriented. They don't have this pastoral, rural quality when they go home from work. People in bigger cities, in places like Phoenix and Denver and Las Vegas, spend their week in traffic jams and their weekends on the trail."

The West has evolved into a terribly fragile place--something McCain seems to understand. During his trip here he constantly touted his plans to reform the way the West, and by example, America, works through an environmental overhaul that included the rebirth of nuclear power. But such grand plans--as large as the grand vistas of the West itself--run into modern practicalities and modern fears.

In the well-heeled environs of Santa Barbara, McCain hosted a panel on Tuesday morning that included much loved Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, McCain ran into a buzz-saw in the form of fellow panelist Michael Feeney, the executive director of the Land Trust for Santa Barbara County.

"I don’t understand how it’s not compromising our environmental standards to propose a crash program to build more nuclear power plants when the industry has not complied with the federal law that requires there to be safe disposal for the radioactive waste,” Feeney said. “There is no solution to that problem, and that’s a big stumbling block for me to a rapid expansion of nuclear energy."

 

When McCain insisted the technology existed, that the nuclear-cool kids--the Europeans, whom McCain mentions constantly--were doing it, Feeney conceded that he didn't know what our would-be models for energy production were doing but bluntly said, "We are not dealing with it in as successful way in the United States at this point. I know that.”


Toward the end of what had been a surprisingly lively talk, McCain took time to laud Schwarzenegger for his ability to build coalitions, to get things done. In many ways, the tanned, chiseled governator and the elder Arizona senator are cut from the same narrative cloth. Both are men who reinvented themselves in the West--McCain from solider to statesman, Schwarzenegger from, well, you, know -- and are both faced with the mighty task of saving this place from the things tearing it from within.

"I believe in bipartisanship and that’s been my record of reaching across the aisle," McCain said, when I asked him of his comments later in the day. "Whether it be to Joe Lieberman, to Russ Feingold, to Ted Kennedy…that’s been what I’ve done...I have a long record of that and I think that's what the American people want. I have a long record of putting my country, not only before my party, but before myself. Sen. Obama does not have that record. He talks the talk but has not walked the walk."

Late Tuesday evening, McCain's campaign plane descended from the darkness above Las Vegas into the lights below. Even for the most jaundiced eyes, setting foot in this oasis in the desert, one is struck by the complete unrealness of Vegas -- how it manages to jumble together all the hopes and dreams, the inconsistencies and myths and grandness of the West. And, as with the rest of the country, it is struggling. Here in the mythological city, McCain had arrived as the man who would preserve the myth.

print print Share share

Comments:

serena1313
Posted 06/25/2008 03:35pm with

McCain says he walks the walk, but he doesn’t. He was described by one of his republican colleagues as “deceitful.”

When McCain reverses positions on issue after issue, both large and small, and knowingly says things that are not true it mostly goes unreported in the traditional media which is unfortunate.

His most recent claims that offshore drilling would bring oil prices down almost immediately and even went further saying off-shore drilling is safe environmentally are both irrevocably wrong.

Not only would offshore drilling have little effect on the price of oil—pennies—production would not start before 2017. Furthermore oil prices are determined on the international market. Moreover off-shore drilling is much more expensive than on-shore drilling. Consider too that McCain collected $724,000 through May from the oil companies.

Equally important to note is McCain’s statement “not even Hurricane Katrina and Rita could cause significant spillage from battered rigs off the coasts of New Orleans and Houston” is an out and out lie. Hurricane Katrina caused such significant oil spillage that it was visible from space. The damage was on the scale of the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster.

“Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has made his principled opposition to earmarks, pork, and federal subsidies well known. Based on those principles, he has:

– Opposed subsidies for alternative fuels like ethanol.


– Blocked tax incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency.


– Opposed legislation to protect the Everglades.


– Mocked funding for research on threatened species."


On every issue, from health care to tax-cuts to Social Security, et al McCain takes positions that are based on political ideology rather than what works. He is the first candidate in history to stump against 2 bills bearing his own name:

1) campaign finance
2) immigration

McCain is well-known to favour military might over diplomacy. And in moments of confusion he says things that are troubling. Recently he said the number of troops in Iraq were below pre-surge numbers. That is untrue. It is disconcerting that he does not seem to know the difference between Sunni and Shiia.

While McCain rails against lobbyists 128 lobbyists are advisors and fund raisers for his campaign. Twelve or more had to resign for conflict of interest and/or corruption charges. Ten, of the twenty-two former oil lobbyists, are on track to win Iraqi oil no-bid contracts. Others lobby for telecoms and foreign countries.

Phil Gramm, McCain’s co-chair and economic adviser lobbied for a Swiss bank to head-off relief for victims of the mortgage crisis.

Rick Davis, McCain’s campaign manager, acted in direct opposition to America’s foreign interests. McCain knew about Davis’ activities in the Ukraine in 2005.

Furthermore while McCain vilifies special interests his record shows he personally intervened and even brokered several deals for big money contributors. Seven or more of his campaign staff and fundraisers lobbied for Airbus. McCain intervened and Airbus got the Pentagon contract. He has helped ranchers get land deals at bargain rate prices.

On the eve of the final Democratic Primaries another Republican, John Albaugh who used to be chief-of-staff for Rep. Istook (R-Ok), pled guilty in the ongoing Abramoff scandal investigation may be bad news for McCain. That plea brings the Senate Indian-Affairs investigation into question which McCain was in charge. He collected over 750,000 pages of documents, but only released less than 7,000. McCain promised to follow the money, but didn’t.

The lobbying system Abramoff worked was created by Charlie Black who is running McCain’s campaign. [FYI: Black is the CEO of a subsidy company owned by Mark Penn’s company].

Note that the aforementioned are a small sampling of examples that ought to give one pause. McCain is a walking contradiction and, as his colleague aptly described him, “deceitful.”

Last, but not least McCain’s push for nuclear plants is a really bad idea. Aside from the radioactive waste disposal issue imagine what would happen if an earthquake hit.

lopaka
Posted 06/27/2008 11:46am with

The scathing attacks posted above by Serena1313 are interesting but misleading in that they don’t address the issue of promoting your own candidate with their own position papers.
The major differance between the two candidate is the fact that in this time of war we need a President who has put his life on the line and worn the uniform himself in time of war. Senator John McCain is ready to lead from day one with no OJT (on the job training) necessary.
It is my fervent hope that he pick either Secretary of State Rice as his running mate or former Secretary of State General (Retired) Colin Powell.
Moderation is the key in this election and moderate McCain is well positioned to win with the right running mate, such as Powell or Rice.
Mr. Obama seems flip/flop wishy washy himself on issues, most notably the money one. By turning down campaign financing Mr. Obama figures he will have more money to buy this election. We can’t serve money and my vote is not for sale!
The reference to Senator McCain that “McCain is well-known to favour military might over diplomacy” is not supported by anything. However, war is a necessary part of life! Peace thru victory is what we all should be supporting the President for, regardless of party. Vote for the person not the party.
Thank you for your time and consideration.

ajamo
Posted 08/15/2008 12:46pm with

Any politician who collect Social Security while he is canfully employed as a Senator is a greedy low scum of the earth, and McCain is one of them, how low and greedy can you get and complain Social Security is in trouble, Making over $200,00 per year including salary and Navy pension and drawing Social Security, and now he wants to be President and if he wins, he will draw $400,000 per month salary, maybe his Senator’s pension, Social Security, and Navy Pension.
Sick damn right sick. Read this all you Congressmen/women, and Senators or any other Government Officials are you doing the same.
Yes we do need a change in our country to the betterment and get rid of the greedy people who make the laws to benefit themselves most of the time.

CATEGORIES IN THIS STORY:

Recent Articles by Sridhar Pappu

Most Popular