To build off Doug's excellent piece today, here's a good example of the wages of not having a human-intelligence network in the lawless Pakistani tribal areas where Osama bin Laden is believed to be. From The Los Angeles Times:
In what could herald an intensified U.S. campaign against Islamic insurgents in Pakistan's tribal areas, a suspected American missile attack killed at least nine people near the Afghan border, local officials said Wednesday.
It was not immediately known whether any senior insurgent figures were among the dead, but officials in the South Waziristan tribal region said those killed included "foreigners," often used to mean Al Qaeda operatives and commanders from outside Pakistan.
And really, who has any idea who was killed in the strike? Similarly, who has any idea about the value of the intelligence that yielded the strike in the first place? I'll have more on this in a forthcoming piece, but one of the problems with having a shoddy human-intelligence network is not being able to check the outcomes of your intelligence, which also weakens your ability to check the intelligence inputs. That's the sort of thing that gets innocent people killed and lets guilty people walk away.
Comments:
Posted 08/14/2008 07:56pm with
Heh, Spencer, wanna know what kind of people were killed in the Pakistani tribal area?
I’ll tell ya!
They was lawless people, lawless!
Posted 08/15/2008 12:35pm with
Get the hell out of those countries we have no business there. Unless of course it war for profit, and screw all Americans, you included Bush your life isn’t over yet. Think about the trouble you have caused on Military personell their famies andall of us, plus because of your war. Don’t you have any sham? No guess not your a Bush.